UK Supreme Court: New Cases on Proscription and Property Rights

R (on the application of Ammori) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) - Jurisdiction: United Kingdom - What changed: The question of whether the Secretary of State for the Home Department's decision to proscribe Palestine Action under section 3 of the Terrorism Act 2000 was lawful is before the court. - Citation and date: UKSC 2026/0099, not stated - Source: www.supremecourt.uk

R (on the application of L1T FM Holdings UK Limited and another) (Appellants) v Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster in the Cabinet Office (formerly the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy) (Respondent) - Jurisdiction: United Kingdom - What changed: The issue is whether the state may deprive a person of their possessions in the public interest without paying or ensuring recovery of market value under Article 1 of the First Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights, where the policy objective is not undermined by such recovery. - Citation and date: UKSC 2026/0012, not stated - Source: www.supremecourt.uk

General legal information, not legal advice. Every item links to its official source.