Montenegro Constitutional Court Decisions on Fair Trial Rights

Ustavni sud 19. oktobra ponovo odlučuje o Sporazumu sa Emiratima. - Jurisdiction: Montenegro - What changed: The Constitutional Court will again decide on the Agreement with the Emirates on October 19. - Citation and date: not stated - Source: ustavnisud.me

U-III br. 652/25, parnični postupak, odbacivanje revizije - Nema povrede prava na pravično suđenje kroz segment prava na pristup sudu - Podnosilac nije bio lišen pristupa sudu u cjelini, već mu je pristup vanrednom pravnom lijeku bio uslovljen ispunjavanjem jasno propisanog kriterijuma, koji je mogao relativno jednostavno ispuniti dostavljanjem odgovarajućeg dokaza, fotokopijom uvjerenja o položenom pravosudnom ispitu. - Jurisdiction: Montenegro - What changed: There was no violation of the right to a fair trial regarding access to court, as the applicant was not denied access entirely but had access to an extraordinary legal remedy conditioned on fulfilling a clearly defined criterion that could be easily met by submitting a copy of the certificate of passing the judicial exam. - Citation and date: U-III br. 652/25, not stated - Source: ustavnisud.me

U-III br. 1184/24, parnični postupak - smetanje posjeda - Nema povrede prava na pravično suđenje kroz segment primjene mjerodavnog prava, kao i kroz segment prava na obrazloženu sudsku odluku. Svaka državina je zaštićena od oduzimanja stvari protivno volji dotadašnjeg držaoca ukoliko oduzimanje nije pravno dopušteno. - Jurisdiction: Montenegro - What changed: There was no violation of the right to a fair trial regarding the application of applicable law or the right to a reasoned court decision, as every state is protected from the taking of property against the will of the current possessor unless such taking is legally permitted. - Citation and date: U-III br. 1184/24, not stated - Source: ustavnisud.me

U-III br. 1084/24, upravni spor, troškovi postupka - nema povrede prava na pravično suđenje kroz segment primjene mjerodavnog prava, kao i kroz segment prava na obrazloženu sudsku odluku. Podnošenje zahtjeva za donošenje akta u izvršenju presude Upravnog suda je bilo preuranjeno, tako da podnošenje istog nije bilo opravdano, niti impliciralo postupanje prvostepenog organa, što lišava osnovanosti zahtjev za naknadu troškova spora. - Jurisdiction: Montenegro - What changed: There was no violation of the right to a fair trial regarding the application of applicable law or the right to a reasoned court decision, as the request for adoption of an enforcement act following an Administrative Court judgment was premature, unjustified, and did not imply action by the first-instance authority, thus depriving the claim for compensation of procedural costs of its basis. - Citation and date: U-III br. 1084/24, not stated - Source: ustavnisud.me

U-III br. 947/24, parnični postupak radi utvrđenja da nije postojala vanbračna zajednica. Utvrđena povreda prava na pravično suđenje kroz segment primjene materijalnog prava - protiv pravosnažne presude Višeg suda u Podgorici, podnositeljka je izjavila predlog za dozvolu revizije, koji po svom sadržaju i navodima odgovara reviziji kao vanrednom pravnom lijeku, pri čemu se radi o sporu u kome je dozvoljeno izjavljivanje revizije - odbacivanje navedenog predloga kao nedozvoljenog, pretjerani je formalizam i nije bilo srazmjerno legitimnom cilju kojem teže odredbe Zakona o parničnom postupku. - Jurisdiction: Montenegro - What changed: A violation of the right to a fair trial through the application of substantive law was found, as the applicant's submission of a proposal for leave to appeal in cassation, which corresponds in content and allegations to an extraordinary legal remedy, was dismissed as inadmissible, constituting excessive formalism not proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued by the provisions of the Law on Civil Procedure. - Citation and date: U-III br. 947/24, not stated - Source: ustavnisud.me

General legal information, not legal advice. Every item links to its official source.